feat(core): add descheduler component to automatically rebalance virtual machines (VMs) across cluster nodes#962
Merged
Merged
Conversation
c39559e to
1b3dabe
Compare
14cc33f to
37cf629
Compare
2a2fa48 to
2d6747c
Compare
f228aae to
940de9f
Compare
Member
|
Please add information to the PR about how this will benefit the user. |
c55c32f to
7354319
Compare
Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Borbat <yaroslav.borbat@flant.com>
7354319 to
2e73085
Compare
fl64
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2025
Merged
yachmenevas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2025
…ual machines (VMs) across cluster nodes (#962) Signed-off-by: Yaroslav Borbat <yaroslav.borbat@flant.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR introduces a descheduler component to automatically rebalance virtual machines (VMs) across cluster nodes. Functionality becomes active only when descheduler module is enabled
Load-based rebalancing:
LowNodeUtilizationpolicy for balanced resource distributionAffinity/anti-affinity compliance:
requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecutionrulesWhy do we need it, and what problem does it solve?
Without active rebalancing, uneven VM distribution can lead to node overutilization (e.g., CPU >80%), causing performance degradation, latency spikes, and potential node failures.
Changes in node availability, labels, or taints may invalidate existing VM placements that rely on requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution rules.
What is the expected result?
Checklist
Changelog entries